29 March 2012

Is there a rule of law, or not?

Nasty Pelousy doesn't seem to think so.

There is no "other option"; stating that if you don't get the results you want you will ignore the justice system is open and notorious sedition.

1. incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government.
2. any action, especially in speech or writing, promoting such discontent or rebellion.
3. Archaic . rebellious disorder.

Refusal to abide the judicial system if it doesn't give you the results you want is the very definition of insurrection. 

So, if Ms. Pelosi isn't brought up on charges for this, does that mean there's no longer any rule of law?  After all, if our Lords and Masters elected officials don't have to observe it, then neither do we.

It works both ways, folks.  Just noting that logical point...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Intelligent commentary is welcome. Spam will be annihilated. Stupidity will be mocked.