Update on the B.S. B.C...

See, here's how the Left argues:

The fact is that the sky is blue.

Conservatives point out that the sky is blue.

The Left starts screaming, "Did you hear that?  The Conservatives just said that the sky is purple!!  That's absolutely insane!  It doesn't even make sense!  What a bunch of morons!"

Except that the Conservatives never said that in the first place, but the Left are either too stupid to notice, or are determined to exist in their own little world regardless of what actually took place.  But TickerGuy will keep on explaining it until they get the point or are made to look like the fools they are.

This is what happens when you don't bother actually watching the video I posted, or looking into the provenance of what you're arguing over - you just throw crap at the wall.  Nathan goes on to post a PDF that he scanned which shows his "layers."

Unfortunately, in doing so, he proved that I'm correct.

See, the issue isn't layers.  Yes, the layers are suspicious, but they're not the smoking gun.  The smoking gun is that there are no chromatic artifacts in the Obama document, but the document is allegedly a color scan of an actual piece of paper, and we know it had to be a color scan because the background is allegedly color safety paper.

....

This debate is not, at this point, about whether Obama was born in the United States.  There are plenty of people who question that, but this case simply isn't about that any more.

This case is about whether a sitting President presented an altered - that is, forged - document to the American public and claimed it was authentic.  You cannot at the same time have Hawaii state that they made two PHOTOCOPIES of an original in a book and then have the White House and AP release "scanned" copies of that document which appear to have been printed on entirely-different paper, never mind that one of them is clearly not a simple scan.

The evidence strongly supports this allegation.  The obvious next question is this: What, Mr. President, are you trying to hide, and we then must turn to whether a sitting President should be permitted to erase the tapes that document his knowledge of a break-in to a hotel....

Keep denying reality, and we'll keep shoving it up your ass.  Let's see who breaks first.