"So you think private nukes should be legal?"

Denninger grabs this argument by the throat, tears its head off and drop-kicks it up its ass.

Is there a reasonable argument to be made that a person possessing a nuclear device would have reason to use it under any rationally-foreseeable circumstance that would be deemed, in full totality of the circumstance in hindsight, self-defense?

I can't come up with the circumstances under which that would apply, despite putting a fair bit of mental effort into it.

We answered the question with logic, didn't we?

RTWT.  I love this guy.  (In A Totally Non-Gay-Way(Not That There's Anything Wrong With That(Insert Any Further Appropriate PC Disclaimers Here.).).)