Is there a reasonable argument to be made that a person possessing a nuclear device would have reason to use it under any rationally-foreseeable circumstance that would be deemed, in full totality of the circumstance in hindsight, self-defense?RTWT. I love this guy. (In A Totally Non-Gay-Way(Not That There's Anything Wrong With That(Insert Any Further Appropriate PC Disclaimers Here.).).)
I can't come up with the circumstances under which that would apply, despite putting a fair bit of mental effort into it.
We answered the question with logic, didn't we?
26 April 2013
"So you think private nukes should be legal?"
Denninger grabs this argument by the throat, tears its head off and drop-kicks it up its ass.